Mutual Funds

01 January 2023 . 8 min read

Cayman Islands Monetary Authority’s Statement of Guidance – Corporate Governance

What is the significance of the Statement of Guidance issued by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority?

1. The Statement of Guidance is in line with international governance practices and re-affirms certain principles and practices that have been discussed in Cayman Islands case law in this area (e.g. in Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund Limited .v. Peterson and Ekstrom [2011] 2 CILR 203).

2. The Statement of Guidance only applies to Regulated Mutual Funds. It does not extend to regulated entities in the banking and insurance sectors. It applies to all Regulated Mutual Funds (i.e. licensed funds, administered funds, and section 4(3) registered funds) irrespective of the manner in which they are regulated under the Mutual Funds Law.

3. The Statement of Guidance applies to all “Operators” of Regulated Mutual Funds wherever in the world they may reside. It does not apply solely to those Operators who are resident in the Cayman Islands. A Director of the Fund will be an “Operator” where the Regulated Mutual Fund is a corporate, a general partner will be an “Operator” where the Regulated Mutual Fund is an exempted limited partnership, and a trustee will be an “Operator” where the Regulated Mutual Fund is a unit trust.

4. The Statement of Guidance is not intended to be prescriptive or exhaustive as to CIMA’s expectations with regard to corporate governance of Regulated Mutual Funds.

5. The Statement of Guidance is not mandatory but it does reflect CIMA’s expectations of what should be the minimum level of “sound and prudent governance” (rather than best practice) that should be in place for Regulated Mutual Funds. Though the Statement of Guidance is not mandatory, it will most likely become a benchmark against which investors, CIMA, service providers, and Courts measure actual practices of Regulated Mutual Funds. Accordingly the corporate governance principles set out in the Statement of Guidance should be reviewed by Operators of Regulated Mutual Funds and, at the very least, become the minimum standards for corporate governance arrangements and practices for Regulated Mutual Funds.

Main features of the Statement of Guidance

Oversight Function

The Statement of Guidance states that a Regulated Mutual Fund’s “Governing Body” (that is, the board of directors where the Regulated Mutual Fund is a corporate, the general partner(s) where the Regulated Mutual Fund is an exempted limited partnership, and the trustee(s) where the Regulated Mutual Fund is a unit trust) should:

i. monitor and regularly take steps to satisfy itself that the Regulated Mutual Fund is conducting its affairs in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, rules, statements of principles, statements of guidance and anti-money laundering or combating terrorist financing requirements;

ii. regularly take steps to satisfy itself that the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers are monitoring compliance with applicable laws, regulations, rules, statements of principles, statements of guidance and anti-money laundering or combating terrorist financing requirements;

iii. request appropriate information from the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers and/or professional advisors to enable it to satisfy itself regularly that the Regulated Mutual Fund is operating in compliance with the applicable laws, regulations, rules, statements of principles, statements of guidance and anti-money laundering or combating terrorist financing requirements;

iv. where required, provide appropriate directions to the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers to rectify any non-compliance with the applicable laws, regulations, rules, statements of principles, statements of guidance and anti-money laundering or combating terrorist financing requirements;

v. require regular reporting from the Regulated Mutual Fund’s investment manager and its other service providers to enable the Governing Body to make informed decisions and to adequately oversee and supervise the Regulated Mutual Fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The Governing Body must:

i. suitably identify, disclose, monitor and manage all its conflicts of interest;

ii. document the disclosed conflicts of interest.

Board Meetings

The Governing Body should:

i. meet at least twice a year in person or via a telephone or video conference call;

ii. where the circumstances or size, nature and complexity of the Regulated Mutual Fund necessitates it, meet more frequently than the twice a year, so as to enable it to fulfil its responsibilities effectively;

iii. request the presence of the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers (e.g. representatives from the Regulated Mutual Fund’s administrator, investment manager, and auditor) at these meetings.

Operators’ Duties

i.Exercise Independent Judgment – There is no formal requirement in the Statement of Guidance for Regulated Mutual Funds to appoint independent directors. However it does require, among other things, that the Operator “must exercise independent judgment”. It could be argued that this requirement will be more often tested in Regulated Mutual Funds where all Operators are affiliated to the investment manager and/or there are no independent appointees.

ii. Act in the best interests of the Regulated Mutual Fund – taking into consideration the interests of its investors as a whole and/or, where applicable, the interests of the Fund’s creditors.

iii. Operate with due skill, care and diligence and act honestly and in good faith at all times.

iv. Sufficient capacity to apply mind to overseeing and supervising the Regulated Mutual Fund – The Operator must ensure that he/she has sufficient capacity to apply his/her mind to overseeing and supervising the activities of each Regulated Mutual Fund for which he/she is the Operator.

v. Ensuring that the Regulated Mutual Fund’s investment strategy and conflicts of interests policy are all clearly described in its offering document.

vi. Approving the appointment and removal of the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers and the terms of their contracts with the Fund; and ensuring that the Fund’s investors and CIMA are notified of these appointments/removals.

vii.Retain ultimate responsibility for functions delegated to the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers, and should regularly monitor and supervise the delegated functions.

viii. Ensure that the Regulated Mutual Fund’s service providers are performing their functions in accordance with the terms of their respective contracts and that their roles and responsibilities are clearly defined.

ix. Regularly monitor whether the investment manager is performing in accordance with the defined investment criteria, investment strategy and restrictions.

x. Review and approve the Regulated Mutual Fund’s financial results and audited financial statements and regularly monitor the Fund’s net asset valuation policy and check that the calculation of its net asset value is being done in accordance with this policy.

xi. Assess whether he/she has, together with any other Operator of the Regulated Mutual Fund, sufficient collective knowledge and experience to perform the duties imposed upon the Operator.

xii. On an on-going basis, disclose to CIMA (i) any matter which could materially and adversely affect the financial soundness of the Regulated Mutual Fund, or (ii) any non-compliance by the Regulated Mutual Fund with applicable laws.

Management

The Statement of Guidance specifies that an Operator should ensure that it provides suitable oversight of the risk management of the Regulated Mutual Fund, ensuring that the Fund’s risks are always appropriately managed and mitigated (with material risks being discussed at meetings of the Governing Body and the Governing Body taking appropriate action where necessary).

January 2014

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Latest Updates and Insights

Cayman Islands: Minority shareholder rights and corporate governance: the implications of the judgment in Tianrui (International) Holding Company Ltd v China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd
INSIGHTS | 16 December 2024

Cayman Islands: Minority shareholder rights and corporate governance: the implications of the judgment in Tianrui (International) Holding Company Ltd v China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd

The recent Privy Council ruling in Tianrui (International) Holding Company Ltd v China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd [2024] UKPC 36 has significant implications for Cayman Islands company law, insofar as the judgment clarifies critical principles governing derivative actions and the rights of shareholders (including minority shareholders) to bring...

Intellectual Property in the Cayman Islands and the BVI
INSIGHTS | 05 December 2024

Intellectual Property in the Cayman Islands and the BVI

The protection of intellectual property (IP) rights in the Cayman Islands and in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) depends on the type of IP right (e.g. trademarks, patents and designs). The Cayman Islands and the BVI are British Overseas Territories and so the nature of IP protection in...

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitration Awards in the British Virgin Islands
INSIGHTS | 15 November 2024

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitration Awards in the British Virgin Islands

The British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) is a very user-friendly jurisdiction for enforcing foreign judgments and arbitral awards.

Preference shares and redemption rights in the Cayman Islands – an overview
INSIGHTS | 14 November 2024

Preference shares and redemption rights in the Cayman Islands – an overview

It has become increasingly popular in recent years for venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) firms to set up exempted companies limited by shares in the Cayman Islands for the purposes of pre-IPO equity financing rounds.